Skip to content
All cue cards
Speaking Part 2 · ObjectsForecast: May–Aug 2026

Describe a Piece of Art You Like

In short

Describe a Piece of Art You Like” is a common IELTS Speaking Part 2 cue card. You get 1 minute to prepare and should speak for 1–2 minutes, covering all four points below. This page gives you a Band 9 model answer, an idea map so you can make it your own, the Part 3 follow-up questions with answers, and the vocabulary examiners reward.

The task card

Describe a Piece of Art You Like. You should say:

  • What this piece of art is
  • Where and when you first saw it
  • What it looks like
  • And explain why you like it
Practise this card (1-min prep, 2-min speaking)

Band 9 model answer

The piece I'd like to describe is a painting that hangs in my parents' living room — a monsoon landscape by a local artist, showing a river ferry crossing in the rain. It's not famous, it's not worth much money, and I'd still choose it over anything I've seen in a gallery, partly because I've spent my whole life looking at it.

My father bought it before I was born, at a small street exhibition by fine-arts students. The artist was apparently a final-year student selling work to cover his fees, and my father — who has never shown the slightest interest in art before or since — stood in front of this one canvas for twenty minutes and then spent money he definitely didn't have. My mother still describes the argument that followed as 'spirited'. The painting stayed, obviously. It has outlasted three sofas and every wall colour we've ever tried.

As for what it actually shows: it's an oil painting, maybe a metre wide, of a wooden ferry boat packed with passengers crossing a swollen grey-green river in heavy rain. The sky takes up half the canvas — enormous bruised monsoon clouds with one improbable slash of gold light breaking through near the horizon. The passengers are painted loosely, almost as smudges: a woman in a red sari, a man sheltering a child under a jute sack, someone's black umbrella turned inside out. You can practically hear the rain when you look at it.

For most of my childhood it was just background — the way things in your home go invisible. The moment it changed for me came when I was maybe sixteen, stuck at home during an actual monsoon downpour, and I properly looked at it for the first time. I suddenly noticed that every single passenger is looking down or away from the storm except one small figure at the front of the boat, who's looking straight at that gold break in the clouds. Once you've seen that figure, you cannot un-see him. The entire painting reorganises itself around this one passenger who has decided to watch the light instead of the rain.

That's really why I love it. It's technically lovely — the rain effects genuinely are impressive — but what holds me is that quiet argument the painting seems to make: same boat, same storm, and one person choosing to face the only hopeful thing in view. I've caught myself thinking about that figure during exams, bad news, all of it. It's become a kind of private shorthand in my head for how I'd like to respond to things.

We never learned what happened to the artist — my father lost the receipt with the name decades ago, which he regrets to this day. I sometimes think about him: some student who needed fee money, no idea that thirty years later a stranger's family would still be arranging their living room around his rainy river. That, I suppose, is what art actually does when it works.

Make it your own: three angles

A painting in your family home

The strongest personal frame — how it was acquired, how it went from wallpaper to meaningful — and no examiner has heard your painting before.

A famous artwork you saw in person

Works if you focus on the encounter — the room, the crowd, your surprise at its size — rather than reciting facts anyone could google.

A public sculpture or mural in your city

A fresh choice that links art to everyday life; describe how ordinary people interact with it and what it does to that street or square.

What the examiner is listening for

Two traps here: choosing a world-famous work and reciting its Wikipedia entry, or describing colours for two minutes with no meaning attached. The band 9 move is one specific visual detail that carries the whole answer (the model's single passenger watching the light) — describe what it shows, then what you see in it, and let the gap between those two be your final bullet.

Part 1 warm-up questions

  • Do you like visiting art galleries?
  • Did you learn to draw or paint at school?
  • Is art an important subject for children to study?
  • Would you hang art in your own home?

Part 3 follow-up questions & answers

Why do people enjoy looking at art?

For a whole spectrum of reasons — pure visual pleasure, the recognition of a feeling they couldn't phrase themselves, or simple curiosity about another mind. I'd add that art legitimises slowness: standing still and just looking is a strange activity in modern life, and galleries are among the few places it's encouraged. At its best, art shows you your own life from an angle you'd never stood at.

Should governments spend public money on art?

Yes, in proportion — nobody's suggesting art before hospitals, but a society that funds only the measurable becomes a bleak place to live. Public art, galleries and arts education pay back in ways that are real but hard to invoice: civic identity, tourism, and children discovering talents schools otherwise miss. The fairest test is that publicly funded art should be publicly accessible, not locked away.

Is it important for children to learn art at school?

I think it's close to essential, and not because every child will become an artist. Art is the one subject where there's no single right answer, which exercises a completely different mental muscle from maths or grammar — judgement, expression, tolerance for ambiguity. It's also a refuge for children who struggle academically; for some of my classmates, art class was the only hour they felt competent.

Why are some paintings worth millions while others are worth nothing?

Far less about beauty than people assume. The price of art is really the price of scarcity, provenance and story — a dead famous artist can't produce more, and owning one becomes a trophy for the very rich, at which point paintings function as assets rather than images. The awkward proof is that a brilliant unknown work sells for almost nothing. The market measures fame; it has no instrument for beauty.

Has digital technology changed how people experience art?

Radically, in both directions. Billions can now see collections they'll never visit, artists publish without gatekeepers, and entire new forms — digital painting, generative work — exist. What's lost online is scale and presence: every masterpiece arrives the same size as your phone. My honest observation is that screens are wonderful at distributing art and terrible at delivering the encounter with it.

Do you think artistic taste is personal, or shaped by culture?

Both, layered. Culture hands you the frame — what you grew up seeing sets your defaults for what art even looks like, which is why taste clusters by country and generation. But within that frame, individual response is genuinely personal: my whole family grew up with the same painting, and I'm the only one obsessed with one small figure in it. Culture proposes; the individual disposes.

Is graffiti art or vandalism?

The honest answer is that the categories overlap. Scrawling on someone's property without consent is vandalism whatever it looks like; equally, some street pieces show more skill and imagination than gallery work, and cities like Bristol or Melbourne now protect them. Consent and quality are the two hinges — commissioned murals are simply public art, and a brilliant illegal piece is both crime and art at once.

Useful vocabulary

Vocabulary for the “Describe a Piece of Art You Like” cue card, with plain-English meanings
Word / phraseMeaning
a canvasthe cloth surface a painting is made on; the painting itself
an oil paintinga picture painted with slow-drying oil-based paints
a landscapea picture showing scenery rather than people
brushworkthe visible way an artist has applied paint
evocativebringing strong feelings, memories or images to mind
to catch your eyeto attract your attention visually
the focal pointthe part of an image your attention is drawn to
to grow on someoneto become more appealing the longer you know it
pricelessso valuable that no price could be put on it
to speak to someone(of art) to feel personally meaningful to a particular person

More cue cards

Preparing for the whole test, not just Speaking?

Practise Reading with unlimited AI-generated Cambridge-style passages and trap-level feedback, and check your Writing against the official criteria — free to start.