Skip to content
IELTSbiz
Band 5.5 · 287 words · IELTS Writing Task 2

Some people believe that smartphones should be banned in secondary schools. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

This IELTS Writing Task 2 answer was marked Band 5.5 on the four official criteria. Its strongest criterion was Task Response (5.5); Coherence & Cohesion (5) held it back. The biggest single improvement: Develop the school-specific argument: explain how supervised use, phone-free tests, and classroom rules could provide the benefits of smartphones without allowing distraction.

How it was marked

CriterionBandWhy
Task Response5.5The position is clear in "I completely disagree with this", and the response gives relevant reasons concerning access to information and parental guidance. However, the discussion is only partly developed, focuses on parents and children generally rather than school policy, and does not sufficiently explain how smartphones could be used responsibly in secondary schools.
Lexical Resource5.5The essay uses some relevant vocabulary, including "new technologies", "current news and updates", and "vulnerable", but it relies heavily on repeated words such as "smartphones", "kids", and "knowledge". Several collocations and word choices are inaccurate or informal, including "huge population of people", "in a right way", and "wrong purpose", although the overall meaning remains clear.
Grammatical Range & Accuracy5The response attempts complex structures, especially in "Parents should understand the perks of using smartphones, but...", and it communicates its main message despite errors. However, frequent problems with articles, prepositions, agreement, pronouns, punctuation, and sentence boundaries reduce accuracy, particularly in the long middle sentence.
Coherence & Cohesion5The response has a recognisable progression from opinion to supporting reasons and a conclusion, with links such as "For example" and "In conclusion". However, nearly the whole argument is presented as one very long paragraph, and repeated linking phrases such as "rather than" and "hence" do not create a clear, well-controlled progression.

The answer

A learner answer, not a model answer — study what the marks reward, don't copy it.

There is indeed a huge population of people who are against smartphones for their kids who are studying in primary and secondary schools. I completely disagree with this ,because by the usage of smartphones students are highly exposed to the new technologies that are being implemented if they use it in a right manner . By smartphones students can have knowledge of what's going on in the world rather than sticking to the textbooks or school curriculum. Parents should understand the perks of using smartphones , but thinking from parents perspective banning the smartphones would not solve the problem of students getting addicted to smartphones or misusing smartphones for wrong purpose, rather than that parents should first understand the benefits of smartphones and further guide their kids in a right way to use it. For example one kid has access to smartphone and uses it in a right way by keeping up on all the daily updates , news , technology and so on whereas another kid without a smartphone lacks the knowledge about all the current news and updates . The kids while they are in secondary school are very vulnerable , things they learn in that age shapes their brain to who they wanna become or what they are interested to study in further classes , hence having knowledge about everything plays a very crucial role on their brains in that age . In conclusion, I would suggest people to get more knowledge about the positive effects of smartphones and technology on kids rather than just looking into the negative side of it, in fact every matter on this earth has both positive and negative sides hence looking both sides plays a very notable role.

Corrections from the marking

  • There is indeed a huge population of people who are against smartphones for their kids

    There are many parents who oppose their children having smartphones

    "Population of people" is imprecise here, and "oppose their children having smartphones" is the more natural expression.

  • I completely disagree with this ,because

    I completely disagree with this, because

    There should be no space before the comma.

  • by the usage of smartphones

    through the use of smartphones

    "Through the use of" is the natural collocation for describing the means by which something happens.

  • technologies that are being implemented if they use it in a right manner .

    technologies that are being implemented if they use them in a right manner.

    The plural noun "smartphones" requires the plural pronoun "them", and there should be no space before the full stop.

  • By smartphones

    Through smartphones

    The preposition "through" is required to express the means by which students gain access to information.

  • By smartphones students can have knowledge of what's going on in the world

    Through smartphones, students can gain knowledge about what is happening in the world

    "By smartphones" is not a natural collocation, and "gain knowledge" is more precise than "have knowledge" in this context.

  • rather than sticking to the textbooks or school curriculum

    rather than relying solely on textbooks or the school curriculum

    "Relying solely on" expresses the intended contrast more precisely than the informal metaphor "sticking to."

  • Parents should understand the perks of using smartphones

    Parents should understand the benefits of using smartphones

    "Perks" is relatively informal, whereas "benefits" is more appropriate for an academic essay.

How this answer could score higher

  1. Develop the school-specific argument: explain how supervised use, phone-free tests, and classroom rules could provide the benefits of smartphones without allowing distraction.
  2. Organise the essay into clear paragraphs, with one main reason per body paragraph and precise links instead of joining most ideas in one long paragraph.
  3. Improve grammatical accuracy in long sentences, especially articles, pronouns, agreement, and sentence boundaries; for example, change "by the usage of smartphones students" to "through the use of smartphones, students".

Other answers to this question

Write your own answer to this question

Is this your essay? Request removal. Essays are published without any name, email or account details.

    Need help?