Skip to content
Back to the test

Band 8+ Academic Reading Practice Test 1: Answers & Explanations

All 40 answers below, each with the exact line of the passage that proves it and the reason the tempting wrong option was tempting. If you have not sat the test yet, do that first — a key read before the attempt teaches nothing.

Passage 1: Why Cities Have Accents

13 marks

Answer key and explanations for passage 1
QAnswerEvidence in the passageWhy, and the trap
1Paragraph Da reason why predicting speech features from location works badlyParagraph D: the sharpest features belong to those invested in local networks, "which is why prediction from geography alone performs badly".
2Paragraph Fthe claim that two apparently opposite processes are one processParagraph F: "dialect levelling and dialect creation are the same process observed at different stages".
3Paragraph Ban account of features being lost rather than gainedParagraph B: levelling is "largely subtractive" and features "tend to be dropped within a generation".
4Paragraph Cthe stage at which entirely new features appearParagraph C: "the point at which a new variety acquires features that none of its sources possessed".
5Paragraph Ean argument that a change does not reduce precisionParagraph E: a lost distinction "has not lost precision" because it is recoverable or replaced.
6Paragraph Athe observation that mixed populations do not produce an averageParagraph A: a city drawing on many sources "might be expected to produce speech that averages them out, and it does not".
7TRUEvarieties as distinct from their sources as the sources were from each otherThe new varieties were as distinct from their sources as those sources were from one another.
8FALSEWhat survives is not the average of the inputs but the subset that is either shared by many varieties or perceptually neutralWidely shared features are precisely what survives levelling; what is dropped is what marks a speaker as local to one place.Trap: Opposite Meaning
9NOT GIVENChildren acquiring a language from a mixed adult input do not select randomly among the variants they hearChildren are described as doing something different from adults — regularising and simplifying — but no comparison of speed is made anywhere in the passage.Trap: Outside Text
10FALSEnot in the most isolated speakers but in those most invested in local networksThe studies find the opposite: investment in local networks, not isolation, predicts the sharpest features.Trap: Opposite Meaning
11levellingThe first stage is levelling, and it is largely subtractive.One word, named in the topic sentence of paragraph B.
12regularisethey regularise, extending a pattern to cases where no adult applies itThe verb must keep the form the sentence requires, exactly as in the passage.
13simplersettle on a variant that was rare in the input because it was structurally simplerOne word; the comparative form is what the passage uses.

Passage 2: The Thermodynamics of Living Things

13 marks

Answer key and explanations for passage 2
QAnswerEvidence in the passageWhy, and the trap
Paragraph Ai — Why the apparent paradox is not oneThe observation that living things become more ordered has been offered as a paradox.The paradox "has never been one": the second law constrains isolated systems and organisms are not isolated.
Paragraph Bii — Two quantities that everyday language runs togetherStating it precisely requires distinguishing two quantities.Energy versus the capacity of energy to do work — the two quantities ordinary language merges.
Paragraph Ciii — A famous phrase that both helped and hinderedSchrödinger put this to a general audience in 1944."Feeds on negative entropy" is called correct on one reading and misleading on another.
Paragraph Div — What accuracy costs, and why it is worth payingThe costs can be counted, and counting them constrains what is possible.Copying fidelity costs far more than the theoretical minimum, and the excess buys accuracy.
Paragraph Ev — Why larger animals spend less per gramThe same accounting explains a puzzle about size.Sub-linear scaling of metabolic rate with mass, and the network geometry that may explain it.
Paragraph Fvi — The limits of arguing from physics to originsAttempts to run the argument backwards have been more suggestive than conclusive.Dissipation-based origin proposals describe real phenomena but predict nothing in advance.
Paragraph Gvii — Hard limits rather than an explanationWhat the thermodynamic view supplies is a set of hard limits.The view supplies limits, not a theory; expecting more has been the recurring error.
21B — the capacity of energy to perform workwhat is consumed is the capacity of energy to do workStated directly, and restated as needing energy "in a low-entropy form". A: Energy "is conserved and therefore cannot be used up". C: This is precisely the misreading of Schrödinger that paragraph C warns against. D: Nothing in the passage describes organisms consuming one another's waste.
22B — because the additional expenditure purchases accuracythe excess buys accuracy: proofreading steps discard intermediates, and each discard is paid forThe colon introduces the mechanism: proofreading discards, each paid for. A: The minimum is treated as a known quantity that the observed cost exceeds. C: The opposite — cells that reduce the expenditure make more errors, which implies the expenditure is regulated. D: Size affects metabolic rate in paragraph E, not copying efficiency.
23C — They explain events afterwards and rule nothing out beforehand.A principle that explains a phenomenon after it has occurred and forbids nothing in advance is doing less work than it appears to.The final sentence of paragraph F states exactly this. A: The writer grants that they "do describe real phenomena", naming convection cells. B: The complaint is that they predict too little, not too much. D: No inconsistency with the second law is alleged anywhere.
241944 (also accepted: in 1944)Schrödinger put this to a general audience in 1944A date counts as one word.
25negative entropyan organism feeds on negative entropyTwo words, quoted directly from the passage.
26sub-linear (also accepted: sublinear)the fact that the scaling is sub-linear at allOne hyphenated word, from the last clause of paragraph E.

Passage 3: The Limits of Expertise

14 marks

Answer key and explanations for passage 3
QAnswerEvidence in the passageWhy, and the trap
27YESit is better posed as a question about the environment in which the expertise was acquiredThe opening sentence sets credentials against environment and endorses the second framing.
28NOThe difference is not in the difficulty of the task but in the availability of the answerDifficulty is explicitly ruled out as the explanation; feedback availability is the variable.Trap: Opposite Meaning
29NOit is not corrected by knowing about itThe final clause of paragraph D denies exactly this.Trap: Opposite Meaning
30YESimproves calibration measurably within monthsNumerical, recorded and scored judgements are said to improve calibration measurably.
31NONone of this supports the conclusion that expertise is worthless, which is the misreading it most often attracts.The writer names this reading and rejects it, then lists what experts remain better at.Trap: Extreme Language
32YESExperts remain far better than novices at knowing which question to ask, which data are relevantThis is the ability the writer explicitly preserves while denying the other.
33the result of what they do appears almost immediately.Anaesthetists develop reliable skill becauseParagraph B: "the effect of an intervention appears within minutes and is not in doubt".
34was weakly associated with poorer accuracy.Being well known within a forecasting fieldParagraph C: "fame within a field was weakly negatively correlated with accuracy".
35when the available evidence is thinnest.Subjective certainty tends to be at its highestParagraph D: coherence is easiest when evidence is thin, so certainty is highest where it is least warranted.
36beats judging the whole at once, even for one person.Breaking a judgement into separate componentsParagraph E: structured decomposition "outperforms holistic judgement… including when both are done by the same person".
37unambiguousfeedback that is both prompt and unambiguousOne word, the second half of a paired condition.
38chancethe average expert performed at about the level of chanceOne word; "about" in the passage becomes "roughly" in the sentence.
39styledistinguished by cognitive style rather than by qualificationOne word completing the term.
40formatto change the format of the questionOne word from the final sentence.

Convert your score out of 40

Count your correct answers across all three passages. There is no penalty for a wrong answer, so an unanswered question and a wrong guess score the same.

IELTS Academic Reading raw score to band score
BandCorrect (of 40)
9.039–40
8.537–38
8.035–36
7.533–34
7.030–32
6.527–29
6.023–26
5.519–22
5.015–18
4.511–14
4.07–10
3.50–6

Academic conversion. General Training Reading is stricter: band 7 needs 34 correct there against 30 here. Both tables are on the Reading band calculator.

Turn the wrong answers into a band

    Need help?