Skip to content
All question types

Task 2 · Band 8 path

Two-Part (Direct) Questions

Two questions asked. Two answers, equally weighted.

Stage 1 of 7

Recognise the question

How to spot this question type, what the examiner is actually marking, and the traps that cap it at Band 6.

Two questions asked. Two answers, equally weighted.

Increasingly common in recent Task 2 papers, and often mistaken for an opinion question.

Also called: Direct questions essay · Double question essay · Two questions essay

Spotting it

How this question is worded

Why is this the case? What can be done about it?

Two distinct questions joined by a full stop. Each needs its own body paragraph and its own developed answer.

Is this a positive or negative development? What are the reasons for it?

A judgement plus an explanation. Both are obligations — answering only the judgement leaves half the task unaddressed.

What are the reasons for this? Do you think it is a good thing?

The second question demands your opinion. Report the reasons neutrally, then commit clearly.

How can this problem be solved? Who should be responsible?

Two questions on the same topic that are easy to blur together. Keep them separate — one paragraph each.

The rule that decides Task Response

Both questions must be answered directly and at roughly equal length. If either question asks what you think, an explicit opinion is compulsory.

The standard

What a Band 8 answer to this type does

  • Both questions answered — not one answered and the other mentioned.
  • Roughly equal development: two body paragraphs of similar length, one per question.
  • Direct answers, not circling. The first sentence of each body paragraph should answer the question it belongs to.
  • An opinion clearly stated wherever the prompt asks for one.
  • A conclusion that gives both answers again in compressed form.

Where the band is lost

The 11 traps in this question type

Each of these is a specific, repeatable way to lose marks on this type — not general writing advice.

Answering only the first questionTask Response capped at 5

The second question is often shorter and easier to overlook under time pressure. An essay that answers one of two questions has addressed only part of the task, whatever its language quality.

The fix

Before planning, write both questions at the top of your answer sheet as two separate lines. Tick each when its paragraph is written.

Merging the two answers into one argumentCoherence 6 · Task Response 6

When both answers appear in both paragraphs, the examiner cannot see that each question has been addressed. Coverage becomes impossible to credit.

The fix

One paragraph per question, each opening with a topic sentence that echoes the question it answers.

Treating it as an opinion essayTask Response 6

Candidates recognise "do you think" and write a standard agree/disagree essay, ignoring the "why" half of the prompt entirely.

The fix

Count the question marks in the prompt. Two question marks means two obligations, and one of them is usually explanatory rather than evaluative.

Unequal paragraphsTask Response 6

A 140-word answer to question one and a 50-word answer to question two reads as one question fully answered and one acknowledged.

The fix

Plan two ideas for each question before you start writing, so neither paragraph runs out of material.

A conclusion that answers only one questionCoherence 7 at best

The conclusion is the examiner's last check that both questions were addressed. Summarising only one undermines an essay that actually did the work.

The fix

Write a two-clause conclusion — one clause per question — before adding any final thought.

Only simple sentences, accurately writtenGrammatical Range & Accuracy capped at 6

Range is assessed alongside accuracy, so an essay with no errors and no subordination cannot reach Band 7 on this criterion. It is the most demoralising cap in the paper because the writing looks clean — and it is invisible to a learner who only ever checks for mistakes.

The fix

Put one complex structure in every paragraph deliberately: a cause clause in body 1, a concessive in body 2, a relative clause somewhere in each. Range is a choice you make before you write, not something you notice afterwards.

Comma splices joining full sentencesGrammatical Range & Accuracy 6.5

Two independent clauses joined by a comma — "fees are high, students cannot afford them" — is the commonest punctuation error in Task 2, and because it usually happens at exactly the point an idea is being developed, it recurs throughout the essay rather than once.

The fix

Join with a conjunction, a semicolon or a full stop — or, better, subordinate one clause, which fixes the punctuation and adds range in the same edit.

Ambitious words used inaccuratelyLexical Resource capped at 6.5

The descriptors are explicit that an ambitious word used wrongly scores lower than a simple word used correctly. "Detrimental impact for the society", "make a benefit", "in the nutshell" all signal vocabulary learned as a list rather than in use, and they cost more than the plain words they replaced would have.

The fix

Use a word only if you know the grammar that goes with it: what preposition it takes, what part of speech it is, what it collocates with. If you are unsure, the precise simple word wins.

Collocation errors inside good sentencesLexical Resource capped at 7

This is the clearest single thing separating Band 7 from Band 8, and it is almost never drilled. "Make a research", "do a mistake", "solve an issue", "a big impact for society" are all grammatically correct and all wrong, and because they appear inside otherwise ambitious sentences they tell the examiner the vocabulary was learned from a list rather than from use. The descriptors put precision and natural word partnership at the top of this criterion — not rarity.

The fix

Learn words in partnerships, never alone. The make/do split covers most of it: MAKE an effort, a mistake, progress, a decision; DO research, work, damage. Then the Task 2 core: conduct research, implement a policy, address an issue, play a role in, pose a threat to, have an impact ON.

Memorised phrases and mechanical linkersLexical Resource 6 · Coherence 6

"Nowadays, in this modern era, it is a controversial topic" and a stack of "Firstly / Moreover / Furthermore / Last but not least" are both flagged by examiners as memorised. They cost twice: Lexical Resource for the phrasing, Coherence for cohesion used mechanically rather than meaningfully.

The fix

Delete every opener that would fit any essay on any topic, and replace stacked connectors with reference cohesion — "this pressure", "such a system", "that assumption".

Articles and agreement, everywhere and alwaysGrammatical Range & Accuracy 6.5

Article and subject–verb agreement errors are individually trivial and collectively decisive. Appearing in almost every paragraph, they read as a systematic failure of control rather than as slips, and that is the difference between a 7 and a 6.5 on this criterion.

The fix

Learn the three rules that cover most cases: generic plurals take no article; a singular countable always takes one; the verb agrees with the head of the subject, not the nearest noun. Then spend your last two minutes checking only for these.

Quick reference

The Two-Part at a glance

Both questions must be answered directly and at roughly equal length. If either question asks what you think, an explicit opinion is compulsory.

Increasingly common in recent Task 2 papers, and often mistaken for an opinion question.

How to recognise this question

“Why is this the case? What can be done about it?”
Two distinct questions joined by a full stop. Each needs its own body paragraph and its own developed answer.
“Is this a positive or negative development? What are the reasons for it?”
A judgement plus an explanation. Both are obligations — answering only the judgement leaves half the task unaddressed.
“What are the reasons for this? Do you think it is a good thing?”
The second question demands your opinion. Report the reasons neutrally, then commit clearly.
“How can this problem be solved? Who should be responsible?”
Two questions on the same topic that are easy to blur together. Keep them separate — one paragraph each.

The four-paragraph structure

1Introduction45–60 words

Paraphrase the situation and answer both questions in miniature.

2Body paragraph 1 — question 190–120 words

Answer the first question fully, and only the first question.

3Body paragraph 2 — question 290–120 words

Answer the second question fully, with the same depth.

4Conclusion45–60 words

Answer both questions once more, in compressed form.

The traps that cap this type at Band 6

Answering only the first questionTask Response capped at 5

The second question is often shorter and easier to overlook under time pressure. An essay that answers one of two questions has addressed only part of the task, whatever its language quality.

Fix: Before planning, write both questions at the top of your answer sheet as two separate lines. Tick each when its paragraph is written.

Merging the two answers into one argumentCoherence 6 · Task Response 6

When both answers appear in both paragraphs, the examiner cannot see that each question has been addressed. Coverage becomes impossible to credit.

Fix: One paragraph per question, each opening with a topic sentence that echoes the question it answers.

Treating it as an opinion essayTask Response 6

Candidates recognise "do you think" and write a standard agree/disagree essay, ignoring the "why" half of the prompt entirely.

Fix: Count the question marks in the prompt. Two question marks means two obligations, and one of them is usually explanatory rather than evaluative.

Unequal paragraphsTask Response 6

A 140-word answer to question one and a 50-word answer to question two reads as one question fully answered and one acknowledged.

Fix: Plan two ideas for each question before you start writing, so neither paragraph runs out of material.

A conclusion that answers only one questionCoherence 7 at best

The conclusion is the examiner's last check that both questions were addressed. Summarising only one undermines an essay that actually did the work.

Fix: Write a two-clause conclusion — one clause per question — before adding any final thought.

Only simple sentences, accurately writtenGrammatical Range & Accuracy capped at 6

Range is assessed alongside accuracy, so an essay with no errors and no subordination cannot reach Band 7 on this criterion. It is the most demoralising cap in the paper because the writing looks clean — and it is invisible to a learner who only ever checks for mistakes.

Fix: Put one complex structure in every paragraph deliberately: a cause clause in body 1, a concessive in body 2, a relative clause somewhere in each. Range is a choice you make before you write, not something you notice afterwards.

Comma splices joining full sentencesGrammatical Range & Accuracy 6.5

Two independent clauses joined by a comma — "fees are high, students cannot afford them" — is the commonest punctuation error in Task 2, and because it usually happens at exactly the point an idea is being developed, it recurs throughout the essay rather than once.

Fix: Join with a conjunction, a semicolon or a full stop — or, better, subordinate one clause, which fixes the punctuation and adds range in the same edit.

Ambitious words used inaccuratelyLexical Resource capped at 6.5

The descriptors are explicit that an ambitious word used wrongly scores lower than a simple word used correctly. "Detrimental impact for the society", "make a benefit", "in the nutshell" all signal vocabulary learned as a list rather than in use, and they cost more than the plain words they replaced would have.

Fix: Use a word only if you know the grammar that goes with it: what preposition it takes, what part of speech it is, what it collocates with. If you are unsure, the precise simple word wins.

Collocation errors inside good sentencesLexical Resource capped at 7

This is the clearest single thing separating Band 7 from Band 8, and it is almost never drilled. "Make a research", "do a mistake", "solve an issue", "a big impact for society" are all grammatically correct and all wrong, and because they appear inside otherwise ambitious sentences they tell the examiner the vocabulary was learned from a list rather than from use. The descriptors put precision and natural word partnership at the top of this criterion — not rarity.

Fix: Learn words in partnerships, never alone. The make/do split covers most of it: MAKE an effort, a mistake, progress, a decision; DO research, work, damage. Then the Task 2 core: conduct research, implement a policy, address an issue, play a role in, pose a threat to, have an impact ON.

Memorised phrases and mechanical linkersLexical Resource 6 · Coherence 6

"Nowadays, in this modern era, it is a controversial topic" and a stack of "Firstly / Moreover / Furthermore / Last but not least" are both flagged by examiners as memorised. They cost twice: Lexical Resource for the phrasing, Coherence for cohesion used mechanically rather than meaningfully.

Fix: Delete every opener that would fit any essay on any topic, and replace stacked connectors with reference cohesion — "this pressure", "such a system", "that assumption".

Articles and agreement, everywhere and alwaysGrammatical Range & Accuracy 6.5

Article and subject–verb agreement errors are individually trivial and collectively decisive. Appearing in almost every paragraph, they read as a systematic failure of control rather than as slips, and that is the difference between a 7 and a 6.5 on this criterion.

Fix: Learn the three rules that cover most cases: generic plurals take no article; a singular countable always takes one; the verb agrees with the head of the subject, not the nearest noun. Then spend your last two minutes checking only for these.

Two-Part questions — frequently asked

How do I know a question is a two-part question?

Count the question marks. Two separate questions after the statement means two obligations, each needing its own body paragraph. Candidates who see "do you think" and write a standard opinion essay lose marks for ignoring the other half.

Do both questions need equal length?

Roughly, yes. Aim for body paragraphs within about twenty words of each other. A long first answer and a short second one is read as one question fully addressed and one only mentioned.

Should I give my opinion?

Only if a question asks for it — "is this a positive development?", "do you think…". If neither question asks, an opinion is unnecessary and the words are better spent developing your answers.

Can I answer both questions in one paragraph?

It is possible but risky. Separate paragraphs make coverage obvious to the examiner and are far easier to control in 40 minutes. Use one paragraph per question unless you have a strong reason not to.

Next

Once this type is at Band 8, move to another — Agree / Disagree, Both Views, Advantages — or check a full essay you have written in the Essay Checker

Go deeper on Task 2

    Need help?