Skip to content
All cue cards
Speaking Part 2 · Media & abstractForecast: May–Aug 2026

Describe an Advertisement You Remember

In short

Describe an Advertisement You Remember” is a common IELTS Speaking Part 2 cue card. You get 1 minute to prepare and should speak for 1–2 minutes, covering all four points below. This page gives you a Band 9 model answer, an idea map so you can make it your own, the Part 3 follow-up questions with answers, and the vocabulary examiners reward.

The task card

Describe an Advertisement You Remember. You should say:

  • What the advertisement was for
  • Where and when you saw it
  • What happened in it
  • And explain why you remember it
Practise this card (1-min prep, 2-min speaking)

Band 9 model answer

The advertisement I'd like to describe is a TV commercial for a life insurance company that I saw maybe seven or eight years ago, and the strange thing is that I can still replay it in my head almost shot for shot, while I've forgotten thousands of adverts I've seen since. It was a Thai commercial, actually — they're famous for this style — that spread across social media in my country.

I first saw it at home, in the most ordinary way possible: my mother was watching something on YouTube in the living room, the advert played before her video, and by the halfway point the entire family had drifted over to the screen. It runs for about three minutes, which is unheard of for a commercial, and it plays out like a tiny film. I remember my father, who normally treats adverts as his cue to leave the room, standing behind the sofa with his tea going cold, watching the whole thing through to the end without saying a word.

What happens is deceptively simple. It follows an ordinary, slightly shabby middle-aged man through his daily routine, doing small unnoticed acts of kindness: moving a plant so it catches the rain, giving up his seat, feeding a stray dog, quietly leaving money for a girl who needs school fees. Crucially, nothing comes back to him — no reward, no recognition, and the neighbours openly think he's a fool. The advert asks, in a soft voiceover, what he gains from all this, and answers: nothing. No fame, no money — only emotions, witnessing the girl finally going to school, understanding, and the world becoming a slightly better place. Then the insurance company's logo appears for about two seconds, almost apologetically.

Why has it stayed with me? Partly pure craft — it's beautifully shot and paced, and it earns its emotion honestly rather than manipulating you with sad music from the first frame, although I'll admit I had a lump in my throat by the end, and my mother was openly crying. But mostly I remember it because it broke every rule I associated with advertising. It barely mentions the product. It sells a feeling — the idea that unrewarded goodness is still worth something — and just quietly signs its name at the end.

The cynical part of me knows exactly what's going on: the company is buying an association between its brand and human decency, and judging by the fact that I'm describing it years later, the investment worked spectacularly. But I think it also proves something genuinely interesting — that people don't hate advertising, they hate being shouted at. Give them three minutes of honest storytelling, and they'll not only watch voluntarily, they'll send it to their friends, which is precisely how it reached me.

Make it your own: three angles

A storytelling advert that moved you

Emotional narrative ads give you a plot, feelings and a reflection on why they work — the richest material for the full two minutes.

A funny advert from childhood

Jingles and slogans from childhood show how deep advertising embeds itself; the nostalgia angle covers 'why you remember it' effortlessly.

An advert you found clever or annoying

A critical take is completely valid — analysing a manipulative or brilliant campaign shows evaluation skills, ideal if you dislike sentimentality.

What the examiner is listening for

Structure is your friend here: what it advertised, the scene where you saw it, what happens in it, and the analysis of why it stuck. The final bullet is where band 8+ answers separate — go beyond 'it was touching' into how the advert worked on you, using marketing language like brand association and storytelling. A dash of scepticism shows critical thinking the examiner will credit.

Part 1 warm-up questions

  • Do you pay attention to advertisements?
  • Where do you see the most advertising — online, on TV, or outdoors?
  • Have you ever bought something because of an advert?
  • Do you find advertisements annoying or entertaining?

Part 3 follow-up questions & answers

What makes an advertisement effective?

Memorability first — an advert that's forgotten has achieved nothing, which is why the best ones trade in story, humour or music rather than product specifications. Beyond that, it has to attach an emotion to the brand, because people buy feelings and justify with logic afterwards. The really effective ones also respect the audience's intelligence; condescension is remembered too, just not fondly.

Do advertisements tell the truth?

Rarely the whole truth. Outright lying is illegal in most places, so the craft lies in selective honesty — the burger photographed under studio lights, the small print nobody reads, the implication that a car will transform your life. I'd call most advertising legally accurate and psychologically misleading. That's exactly why regulation and consumer scepticism both need to stay switched on.

Is advertising aimed at children a problem?

I think it's one of the least defensible corners of the industry. Children can't distinguish persuasion from information until surprisingly late, so advertising to them is less like communication and more like ambush. The rise of influencer marketing has made it murkier — a toy review by a child's favourite YouTuber doesn't look like an advert at all. Strict rules seem entirely justified there.

How has online advertising changed things compared with traditional advertising?

The fundamental shift is from broadcasting to targeting. A TV advert addressed a million people identically; online ads are assembled for you personally, based on a data profile you never consented to in any meaningful way. It's more efficient and less wasteful, but the surveillance underneath it makes me uneasy, and the personalisation means two people no longer even see the same commercial reality.

Do you think people are influenced by advertisements even when they deny it?

Almost certainly — that's the industry's entire business model, and companies don't spend billions out of superstition. The influence is rarely a direct 'saw it, bought it'; it works through familiarity, so when you're standing at the shelf, one brand simply feels more trustworthy for reasons you can't articulate. Believing yourself immune is probably the state in which advertising works best.

Should some products be banned from advertising altogether?

Where the product reliably harms people, yes — most countries already accept this logic for tobacco, and I'd extend it to gambling, which currently saturates sport. The harder cases are things like junk food and high-interest loans, where restriction rather than prohibition might be more workable — banning them from children's viewing hours, for instance. The principle seems clear: the more addictive and damaging the product, the less right it has to a megaphone.

How do you think advertising will change in the future?

It'll get more conversational and less visible — sponsored answers inside AI assistants, products woven into entertainment, influencers indistinguishable from friends. Personalisation will deepen as data accumulates, possibly to the point of adverts generated individually for each viewer in real time. That makes disclosure rules more important than ever, because the direction of travel is advertising that no longer announces itself.

Useful vocabulary

Vocabulary for the “Describe an Advertisement You Remember” cue card, with plain-English meanings
Word / phraseMeaning
a commercialan advertisement on television or radio
a voiceoveran unseen speaker's voice in a film or advert
shot for shotremembering or copying every scene exactly
to go viralto spread rapidly across the internet
a jinglea short, catchy tune used in advertising
to tug at the heartstringsto deliberately make people feel strong emotion
brand associationthe feelings and ideas a company wants linked to its name
the small printimportant conditions written in tiny letters that few people read
condescensionan attitude of talking down to people as if they were stupid
scepticisman attitude of doubting claims until they are proven

More cue cards

Preparing for the whole test, not just Speaking?

Practise Reading with unlimited AI-generated Cambridge-style passages and trap-level feedback, and check your Writing against the official criteria — free to start.