Describe a Competition You Took Part In
In short
“Describe a Competition You Took Part In” is a common IELTS Speaking Part 2 cue card. You get 1 minute to prepare and should speak for 1–2 minutes, covering all four points below. This page gives you a Band 9 model answer, an idea map so you can make it your own, the Part 3 follow-up questions with answers, and the vocabulary examiners reward.
The task card
Describe a Competition You Took Part In. You should say:
- •What the competition was
- •When and where it took place
- •What you had to do
- •And explain how you felt about it
Band 9 model answer
The competition that immediately springs to mind is a regional debating championship I took part in when I was around seventeen, still at secondary school. I'd never thought of myself as a natural public speaker — if anything, I used to dread standing up in front of people — so signing up for it was completely out of character for me. But my English teacher really pushed me to give it a go, and I'm so glad she did.
It took place over a full Saturday at a large college in the city, about an hour from my hometown, and I remember the atmosphere being surprisingly intense. There were teams from maybe fifteen or twenty schools, and the corridors were packed with nervous-looking students clutching their notes. My school entered a team of four, and we'd been preparing for weeks, meeting up at lunchtimes to research arguments and practise our rebuttals against one another.
In terms of what we actually had to do, in each round we were given a motion — something like whether homework should be banned — and, crucially, we didn't get to choose which side we argued. So you might personally agree with something and then have to argue passionately against it, which is genuinely hard. We had roughly fifteen minutes to prepare, then we'd deliver our speeches to a strict time limit, and, worst of all, respond to questions on the spot from the opposing team and the judges. There was no script to hide behind, so you had to think on your feet and keep your composure even when someone was picking your argument apart. We were also being scored not just on our points but on how clearly and confidently we delivered them.
As for how I felt, honestly it was a real rollercoaster. Before my first speech I was absolutely terrified; my hands were shaking and my mouth went completely dry. But something just clicked once I started talking, and I somehow managed to rise to the occasion. We didn't win overall — we came second, the runners-up — but I walked away feeling this huge sense of achievement, because I'd done something that genuinely scared me and it had gone far better than I'd expected. My teacher told me afterwards she'd never have guessed I was nervous, which meant the world to me.
Looking back, that competition probably changed how I see myself more than almost anything else from school. It taught me that being nervous and being capable aren't opposites — you can feel the fear and still perform well. And it gave me a taste for a bit of healthy competition, which I'd always shied away from before. To this day, whenever I have to present something at work, I think back to that Saturday and remind myself that I've done far scarier things and survived.
Make it your own: three angles
A team competition
A sport, quiz or debate lets you talk about cooperation, shared nerves and collective pride, giving you plenty to say.
An individual competition
A music exam, race or speech is perfect for describing personal pressure, self-reliance and the moment of performing alone.
A creative competition
A photography, writing or cooking contest lets you describe the whole process and the suspense of being judged.
What the examiner is listening for
Don't just narrate the result — the examiner wants your feelings before, during and after, so treat the fourth bullet as the heart of the answer. Use vivid physical detail for the nerves and then contrast it with how you performed, which naturally showcases past and present tenses. Weave in one or two topic collocations like rise to the occasion rather than reciting a vocabulary list.
Part 1 warm-up questions
- Do you enjoy taking part in competitions?
- Are competitions popular among children in your country?
- Do you think competition is always a good thing?
- Would you rather compete as part of a team or on your own?
Part 3 follow-up questions & answers
Why do you think people enjoy watching competitive sports so much?
I think it's the unpredictability and the drama — you never quite know who'll win, so there's real tension. On top of that, people love feeling part of something bigger, whether that's supporting a national team or their local club. It gives them a shared identity and something to talk about with total strangers.
Do you think competition in schools is healthy for children?
In moderation, yes, because it teaches kids to set goals, handle setbacks and push themselves. The danger is when it becomes all about winning and the less able children feel like failures. The best schools balance competition with plenty of encouragement so that effort is valued as much as results.
Are prizes important, or is simply taking part enough?
I'd say prizes are a nice bonus but not the real point. What matters most is the experience — the skills you build and the confidence you gain from trying. That said, a well-chosen prize can be a great motivator, especially for younger people who need a concrete goal to work towards.
Do you think social media has made people more competitive?
Definitely, and not always in a good way. People constantly compare their lives, looks and achievements to a highlight reel of everyone else's, which fuels a kind of endless, unhealthy rivalry. Before social media, you mainly compared yourself to people you actually knew, so the pressure was far smaller.
Should everyone in a competition receive a reward, or only the winners?
I'm a bit torn on this. For very young children, rewarding everyone can build confidence and keep them engaged. But as people grow up, they need to learn that rewards are earned, otherwise the achievement means nothing. So I'd say it really depends on the age and the purpose of the event.
Is competition or cooperation more important in the workplace?
On balance, I'd lean towards cooperation, because most meaningful work today depends on teams pulling in the same direction. A little internal competition can sharpen people, but if it tips into rivalry it destroys trust and information stops flowing. The healthiest workplaces let teams compete with the market, not with each other.
Do you think some fields have become too competitive?
Yes, I'd point to things like university admissions and certain job markets, where the pressure has become genuinely damaging to people's mental health. When thousands chase a handful of places, it stops rewarding merit and starts rewarding whoever can endure the most stress, which doesn't seem healthy or fair to me.
Useful vocabulary
| Word / phrase | Meaning |
|---|---|
| to take part in something | to participate in an activity or event |
| to have a competitive streak | to have a strong natural desire to win |
| nerve-wracking | causing a lot of worry or anxiety |
| to rise to the occasion | to perform well when faced with a difficult or important situation |
| the runner-up | the person or team that finishes in second place |
| a level playing field | a situation in which everyone competes under fair and equal conditions |
| to give it your all | to make the maximum possible effort |
| to be pitted against someone | to be set in direct competition with someone |
| to come out on top | to win or end up in the best position |
| healthy competition | rivalry that motivates people without causing harm |
More cue cards
Describe a Sport or Activity You Enjoy
Preparing for the whole test, not just Speaking?
Practise Reading with unlimited AI-generated Cambridge-style passages and trap-level feedback, and check your Writing against the official criteria — free to start.